 |
| |
Finding St. Mary's Chapel
|
|
|
| |
According to
page 433 of the History of Edgecombe County North
Carolina, the first authentic account of a
church being erected in the parish is in 1748. This
church was designated by a reference in a division of the
parish, as a Chapell near Elias Fort's on Tar
River. There is substantial evidence that this is the
church which was located about seven miles northwest of
Tarboro on the southeast side of Tar River, near a small
spring at Teat's bridge.
Shown below is a section of an 1877
survey map in the Edgecombe County Court House. Notice
the references to an Old Bridge and to the
Site of Teats Bridge written on the
original map. (All other text was added in 2004.) If, in
1877, there were remnants of an old bridge,
this might be the original Teats Bridge that was in
use during the time of St. Marys Chapel a century
earlier. Chapel Springs, a low place in the river bank,
is but a short walk downstream. The logical place to look
for the remains of St. Marys chapel would seem to
be between the Old Bridge and the springs.
The only site that is on the southeast bank is slightly
upstream from Chapel Springs on a high bluff overlooking
the river. |
|
| |

|
|
| |
This agrees with what the
Daily Southerner published on March 9, 1882, The
Church was built at Chapel Spring on the Hyman farm and
on a high bluff overlooking Tar River at this place.
There is a rock ford across the river, supposed to have
been built by the aborigines. With the exception of these
rocks in the bottom of the river there are none in miles
of the place.
Another clue to the whereabouts
of St. Marys is in Edgecombe County Will Book A
(page 27) where, in Elias Forts 1761 will, Elias
leaves to his son William Fort land on the
riverbank at a point beginning at the chapel
door. The chapel door was apparently used here to
designate a dividing line for breaking up Fortes
property among his heirs. The possible chapel site shown
in the survey map does indeed include a property line.
In the Edgecombe Library an
undated reference taken from the Edgecombe County
Chronicle (of Pinetops) states that, old-timers
speak of having seen brick foundations, possibly of a
bridge or a building at or near the Teats
Bridge site. This suggests that the foundation of the
chapel might still be found. However, considering the
constant southward movement of the Tar river for more
than two centuries, it is also possible that the river
has engulfed the chapel site by now, especially if the
chapel door was indeed situated on the
riverbank in 1761, as Elias Fortes will
states. The following photo shows a property marker
located on the possible location bluff. |
|
| |

|
|
| |
At the approximate site of
the aforementioned old bridge, there are some
large timbers in the river. One of them is an
approximately one foot square beam that appears to be
driven down vertically into the river bottom. A photo of
it, taken when the river was very low, is shown here.
This feature is near the north bank of the river, the
opposite side from where the chapel would be. |
|
| |

|
|
| |
Following are two photos
taken from the possible location bluff. The
first one looks upstream. The white trunk of the sycamore
tree in the center of the picture marks the approximate
location of the square beam in the river bottom where the
old bridge would have been. The curve of the river is
also evident here. |
|
| |

|
|
| |
This one is also from the
bluff, but looks downstream toward Chapel Springs. The
river curves back to the left and Chapel Springs is
slightly beyond the point where the bank nearly reaches
the left edge of the photo. |
|
| |

|
|
| |
In the spring of
2005 some artifacts were discovered near the above
described area.
(Below) Wrought nails ranging in
length from two to three inches.

(Below) Small section
of the stem from a clay smoking pipe used during the
Colonial period. Tilted to show the hole where the smoke
was inhaled. Stem is about one quarter inch in diameter
with the hole being about one sixteenth inch wide.

(Below) Heavy nail
about two inches long, possibly part of the chapel door.

(The above
was researched by Arnold Worsley between June 2001 and June 2005)
|
|
|
|